Share

Zuma rides again! - Electoral court clears former president to stand as MKP candidate in elections

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
The Electoral Court has ruled in favour of the MK Party and former president Jacob Zuma in the matter where the IEC barred him from returning to Parliament
The Electoral Court has ruled in favour of the MK Party and former president Jacob Zuma in the matter where the IEC barred him from returning to Parliament
City Press/Tebogo Letsie
POLITICS

The Electoral Court has ordered the Electoral Commission of SA (IEC) to include former president Jacob Zuma on the Umkhonto weSizwe Party's (MKP) electoral list for Parliament.

On Tuesday, 9 April 2024, the court overturned the IEC's decision to bar Zuma from running for a seat in the National Assembly.

The electoral court's verdict, which was emailed to all parties, stated that after hearing counsel for the parties and reading the parties' filed documents, the application for leave to appeal is granted, and the appeal succeeds.

READ: IEC bars Zuma from contesting upcoming elections

The order continued:

The decision of the Electoral Commission of 28 March 2024 in terms of which the electoral upheld Dr Matsapola’s [Maroba Matsapola] objection to the second applicant candidacy [Zuma] is set aside and submitted with the following, the objection is hereby dismissed.

MKP filed an appeal last Tuesday to the IEC's decision to remove Zuma from the list of candidates eligible to run in the elections.

On Monday, the Electoral Court in Johannesburg listened to arguments for both MKP and the IEC.

READ: MK Party says electoral court ruling on IEC registration shows judiciary is ‘no longer biased’

Zuma's representative, Dali Mpofu, contended that the IEC lacked the jurisdiction to apply section 47 of the Constitution to Zuma and ban him from running for public office.

He accused the IEC of getting excited in all types of matters when it comes to the MKP and said that he wanted to warn the IEC not to descend into the political arena.

Mpofu argued that Zuma spent only three months in prison after he received a remission of sentence, which rendered his initial sentence of 15 months irrelevant.

He said:

The point of the matter is that the synonyms for remission are forgiveness in the biblical sense, cancellation, extinguishing and set aside. The legal fact of remission is to reduce a sentence.

“The president has the power to pardon even the grossest serial killer,” he said.

Meanwhile, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, who was representing the IEC, stated that Zuma was not qualified to be a candidate "right now" and was not eligible to serve in the National Assembly.

Ngcukaitobi stated that the president's decision to reduce Zuma's jail term could not be used to modify his sentence.

He said:

It was not even the decision of the president to change it from 15 months to three months. We have to confront this matter and not try to tiptoe around the matter and make excuses for this appellant. The president did not change Zuma’s sentence, he had the power to change the term of the sentence.

He said if the court ruled in favour of the MKP, it would mean that some people sitting in Parliament did not qualify to be there.

In 2021, Zuma faced a 15-month prison term after being found guilty of contempt of court for refusing to appear in the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture.

He was granted a remission of sentence in 2023, for the remaining period, following his release on medical parole.

Zuma was imprisoned for three months.

The Electoral Court overturned the IEC's decision without making a cost order.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
The DA recently released a controversial election ad in which the national flag is consumed by flames. Many took to social media to criticise the party, with former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela expressing disappointment, saying the DA could have used other ways to send its message. Do you think the DA took it too far with this ad?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
No, the country is burning
60% - 300 votes
Yes, the flag is a nation's pride
28% - 141 votes
Can these elections be over already?
11% - 57 votes
Vote