Share

New employment equity reporting will expose wage gaps

accreditation
Employment equity addresses  disparities between the highest and lowest paid employees
Employment equity addresses disparities between the highest and lowest paid employees

Government has made significant changes to employment equity reporting requirements with the goal to improve the accuracy and efficiency of collecting data about wage disparities between the highest- and lowest-paid employees.

It hopes that this will enable the department of employment and labour to identify wage gaps and set benchmarks for different sectors.

In practice, this means that the old EEA4 statement of income differentials form has been replaced with a new form.

Here are the major changes you need to be aware of:

REPORTING INDIVIDUALREMUNERATION

In the past, you only needed to report the total remuneration of all employees within an occupational level, population group and gender.

The new form requires that you report the total remuneration of the individual who is paid the highest remuneration in each of the occupational levels by gender and population group.

In addition, you must report the total remuneration for the lowest-paid individual employee in the lowest occupational level in your business by population group and gender.

Only active employees should be included in EEA4 reporting, unlike previous years, when terminated employees were included.

Reporting remuneration of individuals will simplify the detection of wage gaps.

For example, one will be able to easily compare the total remuneration a company provides to the highest-paid African woman in senior management with the remuneration of the highest-paid coloured, Indian or white man in the same occupational level.

FIXED/GUARANTEED VERSUS VARIABLE REMUNERATION

The report must differentiate between variable remuneration (bonuses, commission and so on) and fixed remuneration (guaranteed wages, salaries and benefits).

Certain remuneration items that were previously excluded must now be reported, and vice versa.

Examples of remuneration that were previously excluded are certain types of shares and dividends.

TOP AND BOTTOM 10%

You need to report the average remuneration received by the top 10% and bottom 10% of your employees.

In addition, you must declare the median earners’ total remuneration.

You will have to indicate the vertical gap between the highest-paid and lowest-paid employee, and whether the remuneration gap in your organisation is aligned with your policy.

CONCLUSION

Employers must ensure that they have policies in place to deal with remuneration gaps and avoid unfair discrimination.

If there are disproportionate differences in remuneration that are not justifiable, you need to take measures to progressively reduce such differences or face possible consequences in the years to come.

If you have not yet done so, now is the time to revise your remuneration policies to ensure that equal pay for equal work principles are applied.

And if you have not yet submitted your revised EEA4, you have until January 15 to file it electronically.

Esterhuizen is the compliance manager at Sage for Africa and the Middle East


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Moja Love's drug-busting show, Sizokuthola, is back in hot water after its presenter, Xolani Maphanga's assault charges of an elderly woman suspected of dealing in drugs upgraded to attempted murder. In 2023, his predecessor, Xolani Khumalo, was nabbed for the alleged murder of a suspected drug dealer. What's your take on this?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It’s vigilantism and wrong
35% - 27 votes
They make up for police failures
45% - 35 votes
Police should take over the case
21% - 16 votes
Vote