Publications
Partners
Retirement savings reforms are essential if we are to boost the economy. This might include changing the retirement age to 65 to allow workers to accumulate enough, writes Rowan Burger
Hopefully, Finance Minister Tito Mboweni has some fresh ideas to improve our retirement savings.
It is time for the legislators to reassess the state of retirement savings in South Africa and chart their own course.
The focus on cost saving needs to shift to financial inclusion and quality of outcome.
Ours is a voluntary tax incentivised savings system.
Employers have a choice to enrol their employees in the system and with greater member choice, employees decide their level of savings.
A measure of the success of the system would also be the extent to which the working population is covered and whether the benefits delivered are adequate.
From the 2018 National Treasury tax statistics, there are only 4.7 million taxpayers in the system of an estimated 16.5 million workers.
We also see that contribution levels average 11% of taxable remuneration dropping down to only 2% for the top earnings category.
This clearly indicates that the current system misses its mark in terms of coverage and delivery of outcomes. (It is broadly accepted a 15% of salary retirement savings level, appropriately invested for 40 years, will deliver an adequate retirement income).
- The old age grant is generous by international standards and as it is means tested, it forms a disincentive for low-income workers to participate and preserve savings.
- Much of our workforce is informal or part time, which means the predetermined regular contributions required by the Pension Funds Act excludes them from meaningful participation. (We only have 9 million permanent employees).
- While there is a tax incentive for higher paid workers, those below the threshold have no incentive to tie their savings up until they are 55.
- Threats of prescribed assets and other investment restrictions have higher paid workers preferring to save outside the system where they can control their savings.
- The ability to encash benefits in full when changing jobs leads to more than 90% of these members doing so, resulting in savings terms being nowhere near the 40 years and this results in insufficient benefits.
- With the current poor savings levels, lack of skills in the economy and improvements in the life expectancy, increases in retirement age to at least 65 is essential – in line with international examples.
- Contribution reconciliations and death benefit distributions remain administratively intensive activities and these benefits to members should be better interrogated and debated.
- Disclosures of costs have been important but need to be balanced by an assessment of value created.
The benefit of a significant pool of assets to support the economy and transform the lives of ordinary South Africans has become clear over recent years and the support of the savings pool is essential.
Much has been achieved over the last decade to improve retirement outcomes.
However, the reality is that without a broader focus on and the need for a few more bold reforms, our system will remain sub optimal.
Burger is Momentum Investments head of client strategy
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Get in touchCity Press | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rise above the clutter | Choose your news | City Press in your inbox | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| City Press is an agenda-setting South African news brand that publishes across platforms. Its flagship print edition is distributed on a Sunday. |
