Share

Zuma lawyer: ‘Just a loan from a friend’

accreditation
Former president Jacob Zuma speaks to his legal team in court. Picture: Themba Hadebe/Reuters
Former president Jacob Zuma speaks to his legal team in court. Picture: Themba Hadebe/Reuters

Zuma’s lawyer says no corruption was involved in exchange of money between his client and his financial adviser

Former president Jacob Zuma’s lawyer has dismissed the charges of fraud, money laundering, corruption and racketeering being faced by his client as a “simple exchange of money” between Zuma and “his friend”, one-time financial adviser Schabir Shaik.

Daniel Mantsha, who along with Muzi Sikhakhane and Thabani Masuku make up Zuma’s legal team, expressed these sentiments to City Press outside court on Friday after the conclusion of his client’s application to have the Pietermaritzburg division of the KwaZulu-Natal High Court grant him a stay of prosecution.

Zuma is in the dock on 16 charges of fraud, money laundering, corruption and racketeering linked to 783 payments that French company Thales allegedly made to him in connection with the infamous arms deal.

“Zuma’s first reaction was to ask that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) confirm whether it was investigating him or not. They didn’t confirm. They sent him questions, which he answered and explained that Schabir Shaik was his friend and he had loaned him money. Of course the state made a big issue and suggested corruption, bribery and racketeering was involved, but that was not the crux of the matter. What it boiled down to was that this was all about money advanced by Shaik to his friend and comrade, a person he was financially advising.

“There is not even a cent that was taken from the state coffers, there is nothing,” said Mantsha.

He added that Zuma had been given Shaik’s personal money and that he had been “on record until today maintaining that he gave it to Zuma as a brother in need and not in a corrupt manner”.

Mantsha sought to explain away accusations that included Shaik having allegedly paid R1.2 million to Zuma, then deputy president of the country, over a period of seven years.

The state argued that it was a means to induce Zuma to use his political influence to protect Shaik’s business interests.

Shaik was also accused of attempting to secure an annual bribe of R500 000 for Zuma from Thales.

However, Mantsha painted Zuma as “violated” and said he continued to suffer from the state’s prosecution of him.

“Zuma has been dirtied over decades. We’ve been told that he is corrupt and that has influenced some of us to see him not as a human being and I can tell you that he is feeling very bad about the continuation of this matter.”

Mantsha said the 77-year-old might come across as charismatic after proceedings, dancing and addressing crowds that had come to support him, but the trial was taking a toll on him.

“He is a father, grandfather, uncle and brother ... he has the same feelings that we have and because he has constantly been framed a certain way we have come to accept that it has influenced some of us to see him as less of a human being who has no feeling of shame,” said Mantsha.

Mantsha is himself no stranger to controversy. He was once disbarred and is still being probed by the Hawks for state capture allegations.

In 2007, he was allegedly struck off the roll of the Law Society of the Northern Provinces for several infractions, including allegations of embezzlement of funds, dishonesty and unprofessional behaviour, before being readmitted in 2011.

His comments came after the full bench of judges had heard closing arguments from the state, Thales and Zuma’s own legal team, which had also tried to introduce new evidence in the form of a letter, believed to be correspondence between the NPA and the Hawks, late on Thursday.

According to Zuma’s legal team, judgment on the permanent stay of prosecution application would be handed down in the next three months.

Should the judges rule against the application, Zuma and Thales will face a criminal trial scheduled for October 15.


TALK TO US

Do you find Mantsha’s justification of Shaik’s ‘advance’ to Zuma plausible?

SMS us on 35697 using the keyword ZUMA and tell us what you think. Please include your name and province. SMSes cost R1.50. By participating, you agree to receive occasional marketing material

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Moja Love's drug-busting show, Sizokuthola, is back in hot water after its presenter, Xolani Maphanga's assault charges of an elderly woman suspected of dealing in drugs upgraded to attempted murder. In 2023, his predecessor, Xolani Khumalo, was nabbed for the alleged murder of a suspected drug dealer. What's your take on this?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It’s vigilantism and wrong
29% - 35 votes
They make up for police failures
55% - 66 votes
Police should take over the case
15% - 18 votes
Vote